Monday, June 18, 2007

What's in a name?

Neither Ruth nor I have any strong preference about whether she changes her name or not after we get married. It does seem kind of annoying to have to go through all the hassle of changing one's name and Ruth Lo does sound better to both of us, but there's also the downside of having to deal with oddities related to having different official last names.

11 Comments:

At June 19, 2007 3:49 PM, Blogger Gerald said...

Hubert Lo for the win.

 
At June 19, 2007 8:37 PM, Blogger Felix said...

Lo-Pan, Big Trouble in Little China. Enough Said

 
At June 19, 2007 10:44 PM, Blogger Chang Kim said...

I second Hubert Lo.

 
At June 19, 2007 10:48 PM, Blogger Andrew said...

I third Hubert Lo.

 
At June 19, 2007 10:56 PM, Blogger hubert said...

i hate you all

 
At June 20, 2007 1:41 PM, Blogger Andrew said...

Ok, fine, here's a compromise. You both change your last name to Lopan.

 
At June 20, 2007 2:12 PM, Blogger Gina Fujikami said...

Ooh! I like Lopan. Seriously, why does the girl always have to change her name? How sexist.

 
At June 20, 2007 2:32 PM, Blogger Beth said...

Ruth's so lucky to have the option. Lo Pan works well, Stefanik Morrissey does not!

 
At June 20, 2007 2:40 PM, Blogger hubert said...

all the support for lopan is just in the hopes that we would name a girl lindsay

 
At June 22, 2007 11:55 AM, Blogger Chang Kim said...

Genius, Hubert. That settles it. Lopan it is. Then Lindsey Lopan can play with Martin Luther Kim.

 
At June 22, 2007 5:02 PM, Anonymous roothie said...

HEHEHE martin luther kim is the cutest korean name ever! HEHEHE.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home